WHATEVER WORKS. Sadly, Larry David Doesn’t


whatever_worksI’ve always been a big Woody Allen fan. Yes, even through his period of being publicly crucified for Soon-Yi and allegations of pedophilia (which I simply never believed). Woody Allen’s always been an easy target: an intellectual who makes films that a large portion of the population just don’t “get”. Add to that the fact that he’s not attractive in any classic sense (unless you’re attracted to intellect) and you have a recipe for harsh criticism and judgment. People have historically always been afraid of what they don’t understand. And it’s been my experience that when people are afraid, they tend to turn that fear into resentment. And that resentment is only a fine line away from outright hatred and hostility.

But luckily, the folks who get Woody Allen really get Woody Allen. He is, in my opinion, a brilliant writer, a brilliant comedian, and a brilliant filmmaker. He is also one of the most prolific. And as a result, not every film is a masterpiece. But they almost ALL have something to offer. And so many are downright masterful, in my opinion; MANHATTAN, CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS, HUSBANDS AND WIVES, ANNIE HALL, HANNAH AND HER SISTERS, LOVE AND DEATH, THE PURPLE ROSE OF CAIRO… And there are so many more to add to that ever-growing list. And despite the fact that Mr. Allen claims his films are in no way autobiographical, many of us still tend to believe that his films are, at the very least, a deep reflection of the man and his psyche. 

His newest film, WHATEVER WORKS, while not one of his greatest endeavors, is still a smart and entertaining film with some wonderful performances. Particularly from Evan Rachel Wood. Unfortunately, what keeps the film down, in this viewer’s opinion, is its star and Woody-Allen-alter-ego, Larry David (in a role originally written for the late Zero Mostel). Brilliant in his own series CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM, David is out of his element here. And that is odd because, on the surface, he seems the perfect choice. Ironically, David’s character in the film discovers that things which seem great on paper–Picture 3communism, capitalism, his own marriage–don’t necessarily work in the real world. And so it is with Larry David in a Woody Allen film. Uncomfortable, detached, wooden are all words that come to mind when I think of David’s performance in this film. In many ways, it feels like these takes were rehearsals where David was saving himself for the real mccoy and therefore only giving 25%. Now whether the fault lies with David or Allen, I couldn’t say. What I can say is I never bought the character for a second. Now part of the problem David faced here was that he was, essentially, standing in for Allen himself. And for those of us who love Woody Allen and that persona, well, we’d just rather see Woody Allen do it. But Mr. Allen is older than Mr. David and, since this character ends up on the receiving end of the affections of a much younger, quite beautiful woman, Mr. Allen would have only been welcoming more of the criticism and public beatings he has worked so hard to move beyond. 

I’ve also been told that Mr. David did not initially want to do this role. If true, perhaps he was afraid that he would not be up to the task and that his performance would end up much as it has. Or perhaps his fear of failure became somewhat of a destructive self-fulfilling prophecy. Who knows? What is clear is that Larry David is not an actor. And I’m guessing he’d be among the first to say so.  

Whatever-Works-premiere-W-015WHATEVER WORKS made me yearn for Woody Allen’s physical presence. Had Larry David managed to enter the skin of the character and make it his own, I would have been overjoyed and not missed Allen at all. But that is not the case. Even in recent Allen films like VICKY CRISTINA BARCELONA, we find ourselves in the world of Woody-speak, the rhythm, the words, the phrasings… But that’s a good thing. Mozart sounded like Mozart, Michael Jackson like Michael Jackson, Martin Scorcese like Martin Scorcese, Woody Allen like Woody Allen… It’s a stylized approach. People don’t necessarily sound in art the way they do in the real world. But this is how people sound in the world of a Woody Allen film. And it’s a world I love being in. And some actors just slip in there effortlessly.

Sadly, Larry David does not. And while he seemed like a great idea on paper, he is not able to take Allen’s words and make them his own in any way. He’s a stand-in, a distant second. And a very weak link in an otherwise entertaining film.

Advertisements
WHATEVER WORKS. Sadly, Larry David Doesn’t

3 thoughts on “WHATEVER WORKS. Sadly, Larry David Doesn’t

  1. halmasonberg says:

    THIS WAS A RESPONSE I WROTE TO SOMEONE ON ANOTHER SITE WHO CLAIMED WOODY ALLEN HAD “LOST IT”:

    I actually thought WHATEVER WORKS would have been quite a fun film if not for Larry David. Don’t get me wrong, I like David in CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM. But he’s not an actor. And the reason WHATEVER fails is due to David’s uncomfortable, wooden performance, not Mr. Allen’s script. But it still falls on Allen to have cast and gotten a performance out of David. And he didn’t. That happens sometimes. And when it does, you work with what you have and make it the best it can be. I don’t know if Mr. Allen worked to get a better perf from Mr. David or not. What is clear is that the performance that was needed to make the entire film work is not there. However, thanks to the talents of the rest of the cast and a fun, smart script, the film is still worth the price of admission and still smarter than most of what Hollywood has to offer. But David’s performance (or lack of one) does weigh the film down. From my understanding, David was reluctant to take this role. It might have been best for all involved if he had trusted his initial instincts. Again, I’m not criticizing David for trying, I’m just saying that in the end, he is the rock around the neck of this film. Who put that rock there was probably a group effort. But to say Mr. Allen has “lost it” is to dismiss so many of the films he has given us in the last few years alone. MATCH POINT, SCOOP, VICKY CRISTINA BARCELONA… I even thought CASSANDRA’S DREAM was terrific, both unusual and unique for Allen. It also contained some extraordinary performances. With a filmmaker this prolific and with so many masterful films under his belt, to dismiss him as having lost his talent is a dangerous and misleading game to play. It’s the kind of thinking that kept filmmakers like David Lean from making even more films than they did. Personally, I will continue to celebrate Mr. Allen’s non-stop flow of creativity and his ability to continue making film after film, more for himself than for any particular audience. An audience known for being fickle. Lest we forget the negative criticisms of films like BROADWAY DANNY ROSE and STARDUST MEMORIES. Films now rediscovered and considered Allen favorites by many. Yes, critics claimed he’d lost it back then, too. But he still continued. And the world of film is a richer place for it.

  2. hello

    i thought whatever works was one up from all the english disasters hed been spewing, and im a huge woody fan, check out my reviews, i started with hannah and her sisters…

    r

    1. halmasonberg says:

      Ahhh, sadly I much prefer the english disasters. This was the 1st Allen film in a very long time that just failed completely for me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s